PL EN
ARTYKUŁ ORYGINALNY
The concept of applying Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) to evaluate the risk in the field of maritime security of the State – the case study for Poland
Bohdan Pac 1, A-F
 
 
 
Więcej
Ukryj
1
Computer Science & New Technologies, WSB Merito University Gdansk, Poland
 
 
A - Koncepcja i projekt badania; B - Gromadzenie i/lub zestawianie danych; C - Analiza i interpretacja danych; D - Napisanie artykułu; E - Krytyczne zrecenzowanie artykułu; F - Zatwierdzenie ostatecznej wersji artykułu
 
 
Data nadesłania: 23-09-2024
 
 
Data ostatniej rewizji: 30-12-2024
 
 
Data akceptacji: 30-12-2024
 
 
Data publikacji: 31-12-2024
 
 
Autor do korespondencji
Bohdan Pac   

Computer Science & New Technologies, WSB Merito University Gdansk, Al. Grunwaldzka 238 A, 80-266, Gdansk, Polska
 
 
SLW 2024;61(2):147-170
 
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
DZIEDZINY
STRESZCZENIE
Presented below, the article is of interdisciplinary nature, as it combines problems related to security sciences and methods and tools applied in management and quality sciences. The aim of the article is to present application of the FMEA method used for evaluation of risk in the field of maritime security of the State. The solution to the research problem involves the implementation of the FMEA method as a procedure that allows for the assessment of risks posed to maritime security in the indicated aspects and for the definition of necessary corrective and preventive actions eliminating these risks. During the research, it has been possible to verify a hypothesis stating that the accurate evaluation of risks posed to maritime security in the discussed aspects is viable due to the application of FMEA and the determination of the values of the suitable measures and indicators resulting from that analysis. This modus operandi allows the Author to fill in a research gap with the use of an interdisciplinary approach toward the problem in question. The results of the particular stages of the study come as the results of the Author’s own scientific research discussed on the example of Poland. Consequently, the set of activities recommended to eliminate the risks identified in the area under research is established.
REFERENCJE (20)
1.
AIAG, 2019. AIAG Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis for Tooling & Equipment (Machinery FMEA), Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG).
 
2.
BBN, 2017. Strategiczna Koncepcja Bezpieczeństwa Morskiego, Warszawa – Gdynia.
 
3.
Goetsh, D., Davis, S., 2014. Quality management for organizational excellence: Introduction to Total Quality, Pearson Education Limited.
 
4.
Hu-Chen, L., Xu-Qi C., Chun-Yan, D., Ying-Ming, W., 2019. Failure mode and effect analysis using multi-criteria decision making methods: A systematic literature review. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 135. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.... [Accessed: 12 August 2024].
 
5.
Janjić, V., Todorović, M., Jovanović, D., 2019. Key Success Factors and Benefits of Kaizen Implementation. Engineering Management Journal, 32/2. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/104292... [Accessed: 22 July 2024].
 
6.
Köseoglu, M., Altin, M., Chan, E., Aladag, O., 2020. What are the key success factors for strategy formulation and implementation? International Journal of Hospitality Management. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm... [Accessed: 17 August 2024].
 
7.
Kulakowski, K., Raton, B., 2020. Understanding the Analytic Hierarchy Process, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC, Taylor & Francis Group.
 
8.
Mascia, A., Cirafici, A.M., Bongiowanni, A., Colotti, G., Lacera, G., Di Carlio, M., Digilio, F. A., Liguori, G.L., Lanati, A., Kisslinger A., 2020. A failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA)-based approach for risk assessment of scientific processes in non-regulated research laboratories, Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 25. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769... [Accessed: 12 August 2024].
 
9.
NATO, 2004. ACO Interim Force Standards – Vol. IV. Standards for Maritime Forces, SHAPE.
 
10.
NATO, 2018. AJP-4 Allied Joint Doctrine for Logistics, NSO.
 
11.
NATO, 2017-2018. AAP-15 NATO Glossary of Abbreviations Used in NATO Documents and Publications, NSO.
 
12.
NATO, 2021. AAP-6 NATO, Glossary of Terms and Definitions (English and French), NSO.
 
13.
NATO, 2010. Defence Planning Capability Survey 2010, AC/281-N(2010)0014-FINAL, NATO Headquarters.
 
14.
NATO, 2012. NATO Logistics Handbook, NATO Headquarters.
 
15.
Pac, B., 2022. , The Application of strategic analysis in maritime security development, Maritime Security Yearbook, XVI –2022. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5604/01.300... [Accessed: 22 July 2024].
 
16.
Pac B., Pączek B., 2023. Management of the Navy’s development programme – the concept for the Polish Naval Forces, Military Logistics Systems, 2/2023, 59. Available at: https://doi.org/10.37055/slw/1... [Accessed: 22 July 2024].
 
17.
Stamatis, D.H., 2019. Risk management using Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA), ASQ Quality Press.
 
18.
Van der Last W., Desel J. Oberweis A. (eds.), 2002. Business Process Management. Model Techniques and Empirical Studies, Springer.
 
19.
Zhongyi, W., Weidong, L., Wenbin, N., 2021. Literature review and prospect of the development and application of FMEA in manufacturing industry, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 112. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170... [Accessed: 15 August 2024].
 
20.
Zanoni, A., 2021. Strategic Analysis, Process and Tools, Routledge.
 
eISSN:2719-7689
ISSN:1508-5430
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top