PL EN
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE
The role of communication in crisis management – a case study of the September 2024 floods in Poland
 
More details
Hide details
1
Instytut Bezpieczeństwa, Wojskowa Akademia Techniczna, Poland
 
2
Wydział Przedsiębiorczości i Innowacji, WSB Merito University in Poznań, Poland
 
 
A - Research concept and design; B - Collection and/or assembly of data; C - Data analysis and interpretation; D - Writing the article; E - Critical revision of the article; F - Final approval of article
 
 
Submission date: 2025-11-13
 
 
Final revision date: 2026-04-10
 
 
Acceptance date: 2026-06-24
 
 
Publication date: 2026-06-26
 
 
Corresponding author
Małgorzata Karolina Kochanowicz   

Wydział Przedsiębiorczości i Innowacji, WSB Merito University in Poznań, Powstańców Wielkopolskich 5, 61-895, Poznań, Poland
 
 
SLW 2026;64(1):109-124
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
This article examines crisis communication at the municipal and district levels during the September 2024 floods in south-western Poland. The research niche of this article is the analysis of crisis communication in Polish local government structures on the basis of a recent extreme flood event, with particular emphasis on organisational resilience, information continuity and the practical use of ICT tools. The purpose of the research was to identify and evaluate the key aspects of communication in the crisis management process and to indicate the elements that require further improvement. The research question was: How did crisis communication affect the effectiveness of flood crisis management in Poland in 2024, and what organisational, legal and technological improvements are necessary to increase the resilience of communication to disruptions? The hypothesis assumed that increasing the effectiveness of crisis communication during flood events requires the simultaneous implementation of integrated ICT solutions for monitoring and distributing hydrometeorological data, decentralisation of warnings to the municipal level, and solutions ensuring continuity and interoperability of communications. The study employed literature review, analysis and synthesis, scientific inference, and qualitative in-depth telephone interviews based on five open-ended questions conducted with 17 representatives of municipal and district crisis management units in flood-affected areas of southern Poland. The findings indicate that effective crisis communication requires greater computerisation, integration of data sources, improved resistance to disinformation, continuity of operation, and more decentralised warning mechanisms. The hypothesis was positively verified.
REFERENCES (30)
1.
Abgarowicz, I., Plasota, T. and Napiórkowski, M., 2015. Nowoczesne technologie wspierające raportowanie o zagrożeniach na potrzeby systemu zarządzania kryzysowego RP. Studia Administracyjne, 7, 103–121. DOI: 10.18276/sa.2015.7-06.
 
2.
Alfieri, L., Burek, P., Dutra, E., Krzeminski, B., Muraro, D., Thielen, J. and Pappenberger, F., 2013. GloFAS – global ensemble streamflow forecasting and flood early warning. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1161–1175. DOI: 10.5194/hess-17-1161-2013.
 
3.
Bedrina, T., Parodi, A., Quarati, A. and Clematis, A., 2012. ICT approaches to integrating institutional and non-institutional data services for better understanding of hydro-meteorological phenomena. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 12(6), 1961–1968. DOI: 10.5194/nhess-12-1961-2012.
 
4.
Chari, F. and Novukela, C., 2023. The influence of information and communication technologies on disaster relief operations: a case of Cyclone Idai in Zimbabwe. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 13(4), 399–409. DOI: 10.1108/JHLSCM-11-2021-0119.
 
5.
Farhadi, H., Ebadi, H., Kiani, A. and Asgary, A., 2025. Introducing a new index for flood mapping using Sentinel-2 imagery (SFMI). Computers & Geosciences, 194, 105742. DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2024.105742.
 
6.
Frigerio, S., Schenato, L., Bossi, G., Mantovani, M., Marcato, G. and Pasuto, A., 2018. Hands-on experience of crowdsourcing for flood risks: an Android mobile application tested in Frederikssund, Denmark. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(9), 1926. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15091926.
 
7.
Grossi, G. and Argento, D., 2022. The fate of accounting for public governance development. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 35(8), 191–212. DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-11-2020-5001.
 
8.
Ionescu, C. and Marmureanu, A., 2006. Vrancea rapid early warning system (REWS) for Bucharest and industrial objectives — new technology for earthquakes monitoring. Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica Hungarica, 41(3–4), 349–359. DOI: 10.1556/AGeod.41.2006.3-4.7.
 
9.
Jagusiak, B. and Kaczmarek, W., 2023. Critical Infrastructure Security Management. International Journal of Legal Studies, 13(1), 245–262. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0053.9020.
 
10.
Jałowiec, T. and Spychalski, M., 2025. Military logistics system in a crisis situation. Military Logistics Systems, 62(1), 95–112. DOI: 10.37055/slw/211041.
 
11.
Jaszczur, W. and Łukasik, S., 2021. Selected aspects of crisis management with the use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) on the example of a traffic disaster. SFT, 58(2), 140–152. DOI: 10.12845/sft.58.2.2021.8.
 
12.
Kapucu, N., 2006. Interagency communication networks during emergencies: boundary spanners in multiagency coordination. The American Review of Public Administration, 36(2), 207–225. DOI: 10.1177/0275074005280605.
 
13.
Kuligowski, E. D. and Doermann, J., 2018. A Review of Public Response to Short Message Alerts under Imminent Threat. NIST Technical Note 1982. DOI: 10.6028/NIST.TN.1982.
 
14.
Lee, C.-C., Comes, T., Finn, M. and Mostafavi, A., 2022. Roadmap towards responsible AI in crisis resilience management. arXiv, 2207.09648. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2207.09648. [Accessed: 15 April 2026].
 
15.
López-Caudana, E., Ruiz, S., Calixto, A., Nájera, B., Castro, D., Romero, D., Luna, J., Vargas, V., Legorreta, I., Lara-Prieto, V., Caratozzolo, P. and Membrillo-Hernández, J., 2022. A personalized assistance system for the location and efficient evacuation in case of emergency: TECuidamos, a challenge-based learning derived project designed to save lives. Sustainability, 14(9), 4931. DOI: 10.3390/su14094931.
 
16.
Łachacz, T., 2022. Technologie FASTER a bezpieczeństwo reagujących w sytuacjach kryzysowych. Zeszyty Naukowe SGSP, 82, 209–218. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0015.8889.
 
17.
Marciniak, D., Szymaniec-Mlicka, K. and Kelm, H., 2023. New technologies in crisis management. Journal of Public Governance, 65(3), 73–85. DOI: 10.15678/PG.2023.65.3.06.
 
18.
Moch, N., 2025. Bezpieczeństwo miasta wobec współczesnych wyzwań. Warszawa: Difin.
 
19.
Molinari, D., Mazuran, M., Arias, C., Minucci, G., Atun, F. and Ardagna, D., 2014. Implementing tools to meet the Floods Directive requirements: a “procedure” to collect, store and manage damage data in the aftermath of flood events. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 184, 215–226. DOI: 10.2495/FRIAR140181.
 
20.
Mukherjee, A.N., 2022. Application of artificial intelligence: benefits and limitations for human potential and labor-intensive economy – an empirical investigation into pandemic ridden Indian industry. Management Matters, 19(2), 149–166. DOI: 10.1108/MANM-02-2022-0034.
 
21.
Ogórek, M. and Zaskórski, P., 2018. Internet rzeczy w integracji procesów zarządzania kryzysowego. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Poznańskiej. Organizacja i Zarządzanie, 76, 199–215. DOI: 10.21008/j.0239-9415.2018.076.15.
 
22.
Pashentsev, E.N. and Kolotaev, Y.Y., 2025. Information and communication technologies in political crisis management: resilience, forecasting, and response. Discover Global Society, 3(1), Article 84. DOI: 10.1007/s44282-025-00216-2.
 
23.
Perello, N., Meschi, G., Trucchia, A., D’Andrea, M. and Baghin, F., 2024. Machine learning-driven dynamic maps supporting wildfire risk management. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 58(2), 67–72. DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2024.07.093.
 
24.
Purohit, H., Buntain, C., Hughes, A.L., Peterson, S., Lorini, V. and Castillo, C., 2025. Engage and mobilize! Understanding evolving patterns of social media usage in emergency management. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 9(2), Article CSCW067, 1–39. DOI: 10.1145/3710965.
 
25.
Rysz, S.J., 2017. Integracja informatyczna w obszarze zarządzania kryzysowego. Modern Management Review, 24(2/2017), 117–130. DOI: 10.7862/rz.2017.mmr.20.
 
26.
Tabaczniuk, T., 2014. Wspomaganie informatyczne procesów decyzyjnych systemu zarządzania kryzysowego na szczeblu wojewódzkim – wybrane aspekty. Prace Naukowe Wałbrzyskiej Wyższej Szkoły Zarządzania i Przedsiębiorczości, 30(5), 383–404.
 
27.
Tan, M.L., Prasanna, R., Stock, K., Hudson-Doyle, E., Leonard, G. and Johnston, D., 2017. Mobile applications in crisis informatics literature: a systematic review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 24, 297–311. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.06.009.
 
28.
Thiebes, B. and Winkhardt-Enz, R., 2023. Challenges and opportunities using new modalities and technologies for multi-risk management. Natural Hazards, 119, 1137–1140. DOI: 10.1007/s11069-022-05516-3.
 
29.
Waisová, Š., 2022. The tragedy of smart cities in Egypt. How the smart city is used towards political and social ordering and exclusion. Applied Cybersecurity & Internet Governance, 1(1), 1–10. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0016.0985.
 
30.
Wiśniewski, M., 2015. Doskonalenie zarządzania kryzysowego z wykorzystaniem zarządzania wiedzą i jego informatycznych narzędzi. Logistyka, 4, 8511–8521.
 
eISSN:2719-7689
ISSN:1508-5430
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top