PL EN
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE
Hazard and risk analysis in the logistics safety system based on international quality requirements
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Wojskowa Akademia Techniczna, Wydział Bezpieczeństwa, Logistyki i Zarządzania, Polska
 
 
A - Research concept and design; B - Collection and/or assembly of data; C - Data analysis and interpretation; D - Writing the article; E - Critical revision of the article; F - Final approval of article
 
 
Submission date: 2021-09-29
 
 
Acceptance date: 2021-12-31
 
 
Publication date: 2021-12-31
 
 
Corresponding author
Agnieszka Anna Klasa   

Wydział Bezpieczeństwa, Logistyki i Zarządzania, Wojskowa Akademia Techniczna, gen Sylwestra Kaliskiego 2B, 00-908, Warszawa, Polska
 
 
SLW 2021;55(2):137-158
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The publication presents an analysis of hazards and risk in the logistics safety system conducted on the basis of international quality requirements. The research problem and research questions were defined. The aim of the research, research hypotheses, the subject and area of research were also indicated, and the research sample was defined. The definitions of the hazard and risk, as well as the methodology of analysis and the process of managing them in the company were presented. The next part of the article author presents the place of hazards and risk analysis in international quality standards. The mechanism of risk analysis as a quality assurance system in British, American and Polish defense has been approximated. Finally, an example of implementing the requirements of the quality management system for the aviation, space and defense in a Polish company was presented. The analysis of hazards and risk associated with them on the basis of an example and based on international standards is aimed at justifying the hypotheses regarding the impact of risk analysis on decision-making processes in the company. The research methods used are the cause and effect analysis, the synthesis of information with the use of numerical and logical association in order to collect structured objective evidence. The result of the research is the confirmation of the hypotheses for the risk management process. The risk management process is a continuous process and affects the achievement of the company's strategic targets. The key factor for the actual implementation of hazards and risk analysis in the company is personnel trained in accordance with the positions held. An additional factor is how to understanding and implementing the company risk management process.
REFERENCES (29)
1.
Bogdanienko, J.,(2020). Risk and Crisis in the organization development process. Warszawa: CeDeWu.pl.
 
2.
Braman, G.D., (2018). Introduction to System Safety. In Sikorsky Aircraft, (ed.) (2018) Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. Huntsville, CA: 1-20.
 
3.
Czerwiński, K., Grocholski, H., (2003). Internal audit basics. Szczecin.
 
4.
Ficoń, K., (2021). Safety chain. Hazards, risk and crises. Warszawa: Bel Studio Sp. z o.o.
 
5.
Gontarczyk, M., Marcinkowska, A., (2020). Risk increase as a determinant of the purpose of introducing innovations in Logistics. Systemy Logistyczne Wojsk, 52 (1), Warszawa: Wojskowa Akademia Techniczna, 29-41.
 
6.
Jasińska, J., Pokora, W., (2005). Risk and configuration management in the processes of implementation of armaments and military equipment in the NATO requirements. Zielonka: Wojskowy Instytut Techniki Uzbrojenia.
 
7.
Kulińska, E., Dendera-Gruszka, M., (2019). Supply chain risk management. Warszawa: Diffin.
 
8.
Makowski, P., (2020). Risk as a criterion for selecting variants of tactical actions and response in crisis situations. Warszawa: Akademia Sztuki Wojennej.
 
9.
Moraczewska, A., (2021). Risk management at the external borders of the European Union. Lublin: Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej.
 
10.
Rogowski, B., Woźniak J., (2018). Polish defense standards in the European basis for recommended defense normalization (EDSTAR) documents. Systemy Logistyczne Wojsk, 49 (1), Warszawa: Wojskowa Akademia Techniczna, 174-184.
 
11.
Staniewska, E., (2021). Selected aspects of supply chain security management. Systemy Logistyczne Wojsk, 54 (1), Warszawa: Wojskowa Akademia Techniczna 135–148.
 
12.
Woźniak, J., Zaskórski, P., (2018). Design a process of the organization. The perspective of analytical and decision-making systems. Warszawa: Wojskowa Akademia Techniczna.
 
13.
AS/NZS 4360:2004, The Australian and New Zeland Standard on Risk Management. (2014). Sidney, Modern Economy.
 
14.
ISO 31000:2009, Risk Management – Principles and guidelines. (2009). New Zeland, Standard Australia.
 
15.
ISO 31000:2018, Risk Management – Guidelines. (2018). New Zeland, Standard Australia.
 
16.
Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Poland, Decision no. 126 Ministry of Defense from 16th of August, 2019 on quality assurance of military equipment and services related to military equipment (Dz. Urz. MON z dnia 23 sierpnia 2019 roku, poz. 159).
 
17.
NATO. AQAP 4107:2018 SRD.2 AQAP selection guidance. (2018), Centrum Certyfikacji Jakości Wojskowej Akademii Technicznej w Warszawie.
 
18.
NATO. AQAP 2105:2019 NATO Requirements for Quality Plans. (2019), Centrum Certyfikacji Jakości Wojskowej Akademii Technicznej w Warszawie.
 
19.
NATO. AQAP 2110:2016 NATO Quality Assurance Requirements for Design, Development and Production. (2016). Centrum Certyfikacji Jakości Wojskowej Akademii Technicznej w Warszawie.
 
20.
NATO. AQAP 2310:2017 NATO Quality Management System Requirements for Aviation Space and Defence Suppliers. (2017). Centrum Certyfikacji Jakości Wojskowej Akademii Technicznej w Warszawie.
 
21.
NATO. AQAP 2131:2017 NATO Quality Assurance Requirements for Final Inspection and tests. (2017). Centrum Certyfikacji Jakości Wojskowej Akademii Technicznej w Warszawie.
 
22.
NATO. STANAG 4107, (2019). Mutual Acceptance of Government Quality Assurance and Usage of the Allied Quality Assurance Publications (AQAP). (Wydanie 11), Centrum Certyfikacji Jakości Wojskowej Akademii Technicznej w Warszawie.
 
23.
US Department of Defense, (2019). MIL-STD 1472G. Design criteria standard. Human engineering. Public Domain Mark.
 
24.
US Department of Defense, (2012). MIL-STD 882E. The system safety standard practice. Public Domain Mark.
 
25.
US Army Aviation and Missile Command. AMCOM 385-17. Software system safety policy. Public Domain Mark.
 
26.
US Department of Defense, (2015). DI-SAFT-80102C. Safety Assessment Report. Public Domain Mark.
 
27.
US Department of Defense, (2001). DI-SAFT 81626. System Safety Program Plan. Public Domain Mark.
 
28.
Aerospace Industries Association (AIA), (2014). DI-MISC-81397C. Hazards materials management program. Public Domain Mark.
 
29.
The International Aerospace Quality Group (IAQG), (2015). AS9100 ver. D Quality Management Systems - Requirements for Aviation, Space and Defense Organization.
 
eISSN:2719-7689
ISSN:1508-5430
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top